I consider this photograph a cliche. It’s a well-known composition, and I’ve seen it done many times. So my question is, as an artist, should I have made this photograph?
First, why should I not have made this photograph? Well, it’s a very specific composition and is therefore not original. It’s one thing to go to the Grand Canyon and make photographs there. Of course that’s been done before, but every artist can find a unique perspective or way of presenting the Grand Canyon that is unique to that artist. The subject is enormous and offers many possibilities. The under-the-pier photograph is different because it doesn’t offer as much flexibility. The subject is a simple object. It’s a pier in the ocean. We’re standing underneath it. There’s not much more to it than that. In fact, its simplicity is one of the qualities that makes the composition so strong. So perhaps I am just copying what others have done when I make this photograph, and that might make it less legitimate.
On the other hand, this is my photograph. I made it. I did not go out specifically to make this image. I was on the beach and came across the pier and was inspired in the moment to make the photograph based in part on my internal database of ideas I have seen before. I selected the focal length and the details of the composition, how much of the pier to show and from what angle, etc. I chose to make it a long exposure. I also applied my own style of retouching to arrive at the final image shown here. So in reality I did have a lot of control over how the photograph was created and what the final outcome would be. This is definitely my photograph. Maybe the subject and general way in which I captured it are not original, but I applied my own style to the final image to make it my own.
Why did I make this photograph? Again, I did not go out specifically intending to create this photograph. If I had, I probably would have gone at a different time of day to get different lighting conditions. Instead, I simply found the pier and decided to do it. Why? Because it is an interesting subject and does make a good photograph. I wanted to see what I could do with this image. What might I bring to it that nobody else does? We can ask the same question of a musician playing someone else’s composition. Many other musicians might play that tune, but what is one particular musician’s interpretation going to be? What are they going to bring to the table that is unique to them? That’s how I see this photograph. It’s somebody else’s idea, but it’s my interpretation.
Incidentally, many people passed by while I was positioned under the pier with my tripod. On at least two occasions, I noticed someone pull out his iPhone and snap a picture of the pier from just off to the side of where I was. Would they have done that had I not been there with my tripod and camera?
So is this a photograph I would include in my portfolio? I’m not sure. It represents my capabilities and style as an artist. It just doesn’t fully represent my creative eye because I can’t be certain that I would have made this composition had I not seen others make it before. Does any of that matter? Again, I’m not sure, but at least I found it interesting to think and write about.